September 5, 2008
-
English Only revisited..
http://www.xanga.com/sjkang/671911994/item.html
Well, it has been a little over a week since my post linked above. Wow, the fallout has been spectacular. As of today the LPGA commissioner Carolyn Bivens has rescinded the English only provision...for now. However, I have to ask how much damage has been done? For somebody who worries about sponsorship money pissed off a lot of sponsors (most from Asia) and media outlets. From what I am reading about Bivens and her attempts to market the LPGA Tour, I have to conclude she is an idiot and incompetent. This article sums up her mistakes pretty well: http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/columns/story?columnist=adelson_eric&id=3571125. But, this time around she managed to piss pretty much everyone (players, sponsors, media, and fans) off at the same time. It takes a level of incompetence to that.
How she has stayed in her job that long, I don't know.
Comments (2)
Good move on the LPGA's part. You can't punish someone because English is not their first language and the majority of the tounaments will be in an English speaking country - especially since the majority of the best palyers in the LPGA at the moment happen to be Korean women, who I doubt speak 100% good English. Yes, if they can it does make them more marketable in the USA, wich is where, for the sake of the LPGA, they need to be marketable. But if you really care taht much, maybe implement some program to help them learn better English for their own good. What makes a sport more popular and marketable is the marquee players of the game, and as said, the majority of the marquedd players on the LPGA at this time are Korean. Other than Michelle Wie and a couple of others, I don't think I could name any other American women golfers, but know the names of several Korean golfers. Unfortunately the LPGA will probably always take a back seat the the PGA, because it is ingrained in our minds that women's sports is just not as good or interesting as women's - It is not necessarily true, but it is true in that it is the way most people think. I am glad they repealed this rule. It would have hurt the game. But I can understand what they were trying to do with it and I think they had good intentions, but they realized it was not a good thing and canned it.
yeah, dude. it'd be great to catch up sometime.
0-3 in fantasy??? wow, that's harsh. i've found that i get way too easily depressed after a fantasy loss! kinda sad, huh?
Comments are closed.